When I first developed my online submissions system for Clarkesworld Magazine, I never expected it to take on a life of its own. If you told me that it would eventually be used by Asimov’s, I would have laughed at you… but here we are. Yes, if you haven’t heard, Asimov’s is accepting online submissions and they are the first of the big three to do so. I think this is fantastic.
This has been a long time in the making. Sheila and I first started talking about online submissions at Worldcon. At some point, I have to write up the whole story of secret meetings, demos, coding and the rest. It’s been fun and I’m quite proud to have been a part of this.
By the way, they are running a newer version of the software than anyone else. I’ll be updating other sites as the opportunities arise.
samhenderson
That is fantastic. I really like that system.
ideealisme
Thank you for passing on this info!
jimkeller
This has been a long time coming. Thank you! (And, obviously, tell Sheila Williams we writers say thank you.)
graygirl
Fantastic!
pbray
How extremely cool!
ericreynolds
This is a very good thing. I only accept electronic submissions as well. Sure, it’s possible it will make the slush pile bigger, but I hate to think of some of the stories I’ve published that I might not have gotten had I not accepted them via email.
wyrmadmin
Fortunately, there are multiple ways to keep a slush pile in check and most of them can be enforced by a form-based submission system. Making things easier for authors doesn’t have to make things harder for editors. (I know, preaching to the choir…)
a_r_williams
::mouth hanging open::
What?
a_r_williams
That is great news! I love your submission system. It’s the best evah!
rarelytame
Here’s a question, and I wonder if anyone here can tell me the answer. A friend just pointed out to me that Asimov’s payment scheme (outlined on the page linked above) pays less than pro rates between 9000 and 12,500 words. A flat payment of $450 for anything between 7500 and 12500 means… less than 5 cents a word for anything between 9 and 12.5k, right?
Am I reading that wrong? And if they’re paying less than 5 cents a word for fiction, wouldn’t that knock them off SFWA’s pro markets list?
That can’t be right, can it?
(Please don’t snark at me. I’m only asking because I genuinely don’t understand and am hoping someone here will know the answer. It’s probably a question better directed at SFWA, but I’m not presently a member, and… I know lots of Clarkesworld readers are smart and might know the answer. Thanks!)
Anonymous
The rate for stories never goes beneath 5 cents per word. Authors make a flat rate over 7500 until the word rate for the flat rate equals 5 cents a word for the actual word count. For a beginning writer this means that an author gets $450 for stories that run from 7500 words to 9000 words. Someone getting 8 cents makes $600 for stories running from 7500 words to 12,000 words. After the 9000 or the 12,000 point, the whole story is paid at 5 cents per word. This complicated system was set up so that no one is ever paid less for a long story than they’d make on a short story.
–Sheila Williams
rarelytame
Hey, thanks for clearing that up! Good to know.
starshipcat
That’s wonderful news. It’s especially hard for writers in a tight economy to scrape together the necessary postage money to send postal submissions, particularly if there’s a high chance that they’ll be rejected. Doubly so if there are other family members who have an interest in their spending.
I know I have family members that view money spent on postal submissions that get rejected to be money thrown down a rathole. As tight as our finances have been of late, I’ve been much more likely to send stuff to a market if I can do so electronically and don’t have to have the Discussion about whether the risk that it’ll be rejected (very high for places like Asimovs, Analog, F&SF and Realms of Fantasy) is acceptable or if that money would be better reserved to be spent on postage to ship books for our bookselling business, for which we have already been paid.
wyrmadmin
The postage issue becomes even more critical when you consider international submissions.
oneminutemonkey
It’s about time a leading science fiction magazine like Asimov’s embraced future technology. :>
wyrmadmin
One down… many to go. I suspect people will be paying close attention to how things work out for Sheila.
will_couvillier
You’ll be known as the person who modernized the essential genre submission process. Cool stuff!
kmarkhoover
It’s def good news.
dr_phil_physics
Dare we start calling the Clarkesworld submission system an Industry Standard?
Congratulations, good sir!
Dr. Phil
wyrmadmin
Not even in my wildest dreams. 🙂
snickelish
This is wonderful news! Your efforts in building your system and your willingness to share with other mags is much appreciated. Thank you!
Anonymous
I’m curious who you would say the “big three” are other than Asimov’s. I have guesses but they total more than three so I’m curious as to who makes the metaphorical cut.
wyrmadmin
The “big three” are Asimov’s, Analog and F&SF. Not sure where the title originated, but they’ve been referred to that way for a while now. It may have once referred to readership, but I see it as more of a title of respect. (Recognizing longevity, awards, professionalism, impact, etc.)
wyrmadmin
Re: Impressive!
Thanks! I look forward to seeing a story from you.
Anonymous
Аудио-курс от НЛП-Тренера
[url=http://god-n-devil-inc.livejournal.com/13959.html]Дизайн внутренних состояний[/url]
Anonymous
CWSUBMISSIONS Backend
I’ve been working on a submissions system for my own magazine. I hope you don’t mind; I modeled the user front end after CWSUBMISSIONS. Let’s face it, there’s not a whole lot different that can be changed about it without being unnecessarily complicated. What I was curious about is what is the back end like? I’m working on an management system integrated with the WordPress administrative back end.